The Wolf of Wall Street

Star Icon

[This is another of my reviews posted on Netflix that I have to re-post again and again.  Evidently, they object to my opinion and use that to justify clicking the ‘objectionable content’ box that will get my review automatically pulled from the site.  At least here, on my very own blog, I won’t have that problem.  It does get disheartening when someone disagrees with my thoughts so much they would not just vote it as ‘unhelpful’ but go so far as to get it removed from the site entirely.  If you see the issue differently than I do, I invite you to leave a comment so we can discuss it like civilized human beings.]

“There’s no nobility in poverty” according to Jordan Belfort (Leonardo DiCaprio), a morally reprehensible stockbroker who evidently has no conscience whatsoever. That’s as may be, but there’s also no inherent nobility in being filthy rich, especially when you’ve committed egregious acts of greed and corruption to attain it. The Wolf of Wall Street exemplifies the words of Obi-wan Kenobi describing the Mos Eisley spaceport, “a wretched hive of scum and villainy.” These denizens of Wall Street worship at the altar of Money and venerate those who best practice the seven deadly sins. It is worth noting that there are plenty of hard-working stockbrokers who carefully and responsibly tend other people’s money. This lot, however, care absolutely not one whit about good stewardship but instead take pride in being venal predators who actively laugh at their clients’ gullibility as they gleefully line only their own pockets, bilking hard-earned money from people who can ill-afford to lose it. This movie certainly succeeds in portraying the malignant debauched lifestyle of Belfort, whose company resembles more of a lunatic asylum where the inmates run wild and everyone indulges in the most lewd excesses instead of being a professional financial institution.

Tawdry, obscene and unconscionably wanton, this film is full of the most appallingly foul language to such an extent that if the script left out all the expletives it would cut the run time in half (the same thing has been said about Good Will Hunting, but in the case of that film the rest of the content is so wonderful I forgave the language.  Needless to say, this film did not achieve the same level of grace with me). I found very little of redeeming value in the narrative although I can appreciate the caliber of acting performances. Bits here and there were funny but on the whole it was an illustration of terrible choices, of how not to live your life. Rampant sexual orgies, constant drug use and a lack of anything remotely resembling ethics made this horrifying to watch. I guess I just don’t particularly care for movies that seem obsessed with the seedier side of life and show the most graphic and repulsive things for the sake of being edgy and controversial. So slimy and perverted, I feel I need a shower in order wash away the stench of this raunchy sleaze-fest. – BETHANY

For more on who was involved in The Wolf of Wall Street, visit the Internet Movie Database

Leonardo DiCaprio‘s Jordan Belfort and his sole reason for living.

Matthew McConaughey as Mark Hanna.

Belfort and wife #2, played by Margot Robbie.

Here’s a fun activity – cover a hooker in money!

Or have hookers give you a “money massage”.

Jonah Hill in the famous scene where he swallows a live goldfish (he didn’t really, in case you were wondering).

Ah, the life of a greedy amoral sociopath …

Just another day at the office of Stratton Oakmont.

Jordan explains to FBI agent Denham (Kyle Chandler) that he’s doing nothing illegal.

Sir, I have an amazing opportunity for you to invest in a bridge somewhere …  (Jonah Hill)



Photos courtesy of Paramount Pictures, Red Granite Pictures, Appian Way, Sikelia Productions and EMJAG Productions (unless otherwise credited in clickable form)


4 thoughts on “The Wolf of Wall Street

  1. Hi Bethany! Saw your review of The 100 on Netflix and figured I’d take a look at your site (I agree btw, great show). Very good stuff you got on here as well.

    I just wanted to say that while I’m sure most if not all of the “inappropriate” votes your reviews get are from trolls who disagree with you, technically you are breaking the rules by leaving your website URL at the end of your posts ( I’m assuming you do that for all of your reviews there. Doesn’t really bother me but it does bother Netflix apparently so you should probably be cautious of this in the future. Maybe leave the URL out of your reviews that go against popular opinion so they’ll have no grounds to remove it (not sure if they are removed automatically or if Netflix reviews ones that are flagged as inappropriate too much though). Hope this helps!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Thank you for your kind words. And thanks for bringing it to my attention that I’ve inadvertently been breaking the rules on the Netflix website. I’ve put in websites in my reviews, such as the petition site to save Surviving Jack, and I’ve never had a problem. It’s only been in the past week that I’ve been including a link to my own site in any of the reviews posted on Netflix, so it is definitely not the cause of my stuff getting pulled repeatedly over the last several years. But now they evidently have justification, so I’ll need to put some thought into how to solve the problem. I’ve seen other people include links to their own websites, so I figured it was OK. Anyway, thanks for the info and I’m glad you are enjoying my reviews.


  3. words and pictures… was intrigued by your review and have thus decided to watch this movie. Agree very much with your synopsis of “Wolf of Wall Street” … used to be very much a fan of Leonardo, but his movies are becoming less intriguing as time goes on…. and “Wolf” was very much, as you said, a movie devoid of pretty much any redeeming features….

    Liked by 1 person

    1. ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’ was excellent for what it was, a film designed to shock the Academy Awards into dishing out trophies and to stir up the hornet’s nest that is the ‘Occupy Wall street’ movement. But it was not necessarily enjoyable to watch and really, what fun is it when you absolutely despise the main character in a story?

      Concerning ‘Words and Pictures’, I’ve made a few modifications to the review as I think I wasn’t quite clear that it’s not really a comedy. Both characters are very damaged and some scenes were very hard to watch.


You are cordially invited to comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s